Skip to content

Group Emmett Design Architects — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 53 / 100 · Rank 27 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5164−13
Technical7588−13
Local presence8376+7
Visibility174+13
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust5549.5+5.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-13
Technical-13
Local presence+7
Visibility+13
AI search presence+20
Content & trust+5.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 55.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeter#75
architect Exeter#62
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeter#45
commercial architects Exeter#40
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV51
Technical75
Local presence83
Visibility17
AI search presence20
Content & trust55

this firm sector median leader

Group Emmett Design Architects trails Living Space Architects by 174 points across 5 pillars, but 67% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exetercited by domain
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews3
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust55about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 682 words
Visibility17ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 55.5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence833 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Speed & CWV: 51/100, below the sector median of 64.
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 100); Visibility (17 vs 53); Speed & CWV (51 vs 79).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Group Emmett Design Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Thomas Souster - Architect#2555/1002 places above you
L+ Architects#2953/1002 places below you
MRM Design Studio Ltd#2455/1003 places above you
Mark Muir Architect#3053/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 44 · accessibility 81 · best practices 96 · SEO 77 — biggest losses: Layout shift culprits; Document request latency; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.
Google profile detail4 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks26 referring domains · 34 links · rank 99
Site structure1 pages crawled · 17 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 6 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap6 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 161 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Group Emmett Design Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.