Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
65
Technical
100
Local presence
67
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
62
this firm sector median leader
L+ Architects trails Living Space Architects by 188 points across 4 pillars, but 81% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.
Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); Local presence (67 vs 88).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 67 · accessibility 89 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Document does not have a main landmark.; Browser errors were logged to the console
Google profile detail
36 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
L+ Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.