Skip to content

Smithers Purslow — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 53 / 100 · Rank 31 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8164+17
Technical8888level
Local presence6376−13
Visibility04−4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7049.5+20.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+17
Technical0
Local presence-13
Visibility-4
AI search presence0
Content & trust+20.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 2.1 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeternot in top 100
architect Exeternot in top 100
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeternot in top 100
commercial architects Exeternot in top 100
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV81
Technical88
Local presence63
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Smithers Purslow trails Living Space Architects by 190 points across 4 pillars, but 81% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,245 words · last changed: 768 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence630 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 76.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); Local presence (63 vs 88).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Restart Google review generation and complete the Business Profile to close the local-pack gap.
The firms nearest Smithers Purslow in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
L+ Architects#2953/1002 places above you
Burley Partnership Ltd#3351/1002 places below you
Hann Design Studio#2853/1003 places above you
Dunn Marino Associates#3451/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 69 · accessibility 99 · best practices 74 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; LCP request discovery; Use efficient cache lifetimes
Google profile detailclaimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks113 referring domains · 1022 links · rank 189
Site structure1 pages crawled · 0 internal links per page
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates

Smithers Purslow’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.