Skip to content

Thomas Souster - Architect — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 55 / 100 · Rank 25 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5864−6
Technical10088+12
Local presence8676+10
Visibility44level
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust3049.5−19.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-6
Technical+12
Local presence+10
Visibility0
AI search presence+20
Content & trust-19.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 292 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 50, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeter#50
architect Exeternot in top 100
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeternot in top 100
commercial architects Exeternot in top 100
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV58
Technical100
Local presence86
Visibility4
AI search presence20
Content & trust30

this firm sector median leader

Thomas Souster - Architect trails Living Space Architects by 175 points across 5 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?cited by domain
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews7
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days3
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • design process3
  • planning application2
  • patience2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust30about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 292 words
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 50 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence867 reviews · rated 5 · 3 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 30/100, below the sector median of 49.5.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (20 vs 100); Visibility (4 vs 53); Content & trust (30 vs 53).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Thomas Souster - Architect in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Bailey Partnership (Group) Ltd#2355/1002 places above you
Group Emmett Design Architects#2753/1002 places below you
Axiom Architects#2255/1003 places above you
Hann Design Studio#2853/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 58 · accessibility 95 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Use efficient cache lifetimes; Legacy JavaScript; Render-blocking requests
Google profile detail7 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 7 reviews are one star
Backlinks38 referring domains · 100 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 39 internal links per page · reachable in: about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 16 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap16 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 11 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Thomas Souster - Architect’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.