Skip to content

Plinth Architecture — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 44 / 100 · Rank 46 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8563+22
Technical3375−42
Local presence7973+6
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust35not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+22
Technical-42
Local presence+6
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architectural services Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extension architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
planning application architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
listed building architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
residential architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
self build architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV85
Technical33
Local presence79
Visibility0
AI search presence0

this firm sector median leader

Plinth Architecture trails RE-Design Architects by 205 points across 4 pillars, but 72% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence791 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical33HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 33/100, below the sector median of 75.

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Technical (33 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 49).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
The firms nearest Plinth Architecture in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Gooding Group Architects & Surveyors#4444/1002 places above you
Magri Williams Architects#4843/1002 places below you
Smith Hotchen Partnership#4345/1003 places above you
CPLC Associates Ltd#4940/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 88 · accessibility 94 · best practices 96 · SEO 40 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Render-blocking requests; Use efficient cache lifetimes
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks18 referring domains · 19 links · rank 0 · 27 broken
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 404

Plinth Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.