Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Bristol Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Bristol Vet Specialists, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
52
Technical
100
Local presence
78
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
78
this firm sector median leader
Watkins & Tasker Vets trails Bristol Vet Specialists by 166 points across 4 pillars, but 70% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 47 · accessibility 85 · best practices 96 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Buttons do not have an accessible name
Google profile detail
27 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed · 5 of 158 reviews are one star
Watkins & Tasker Vets’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.