Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Bristol Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Bristol Vet Specialists, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
62
Technical
0
Local presence
83
Visibility
21
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Bath Veterinary Group, Park Road Vets trails Bristol Vet Specialists by 230 points across 5 pillars, but 70% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone.
Largest Contentful Paint measured two ways: one throttled lab run, against 28 days of real Chrome users.
Lab (Lighthouse, mobile)
12.7s
one throttled load on a datacentre machine
Field (real users)
1.4s
75th percentile of actual Chrome visitors over 28 days
The lab figure is 9.2× the real-user figure. The lab test looks acceptable while real visitors are failing Core Web Vitals. This is the more serious direction of disagreement: the problem is real and a one-off lab run is missing it. The metric failing for real users is responsiveness (INP).
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Bath Veterinary Group, Park Road Vets’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.