Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Bristol Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 07931855 · 14.6 years old · active · SIC 99999
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 60 · accessibility 90 · best practices 73 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Use efficient cache lifetimes; Legacy JavaScript; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Google profile detail
14 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 14 reviews are one star
Vale Vets’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.