Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
67
Technical
50
Local presence
59
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Studio Green Architects trails 3bd Architects by 144 points across 4 pillars, but 58% of that is Technical and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 13492861 · 5.2 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 71 · accessibility 95 · best practices 74 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: LCP request discovery; Does not use HTTPS; Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Studio Green Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.