Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
60
Technical
33
Local presence
76
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Keep Architecture trails 3bd Architects by 151 points across 4 pillars, but 71% of that is Technical and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 59 · accessibility 67 · best practices 78 · SEO 80 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; Document request latency; `<html>` element does not have a `[lang]` attribute
Google profile detail
2 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Keep Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.