Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
2 critical problems found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 5 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
100
Technical
25
Local presence
59
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
13
this firm sector median leader
Architectural Interiors trails 3bd Architects by 198 points across 4 pillars, but 69% of that is Technical and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 04502726 · 24.1 years old · active · SIC 68209
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 100 · accessibility 56 · best practices 78 · SEO 50 — biggest losses: `<html>` element does not have a `[lang]` attribute; Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail
5 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks
39 referring domains · 43 links · rank 0
Site structure
robots.txt asks crawlers not to read this site, so it was not crawled
Architectural Interiors’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.