Skip to content

keyframe — Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 39 / 100 · Rank 65 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8166+15
Technical4375−32
Local presence5976.5−17.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2040.5−20.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+15
Technical-32
Local presence-17.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-20.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 74 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bristolnot in top 100
architect Bristolnot in top 100
architectural services Bristolnot in top 100
house extension architect Bristolnot in top 100
planning application architect Bristolnot in top 100
listed building architect Bristolnot in top 100
residential architects Bristolnot in top 100
commercial architects Bristolnot in top 100
self build architect Bristolnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
conservation architect Bristolnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV81
Technical43
Local presence59
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust20

this firm sector median leader

keyframe trails 3bd Architects by 192 points across 5 pillars, but 58% of that is Technical and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bristol?
Which architect in Bristol would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bristol
I need an architect in Bristol - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bristol
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust20about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 74 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical43HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: no
  • Technical: 43/100, below the sector median of 75.
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 76.5.
  • Content & trust: 20/100, below the sector median of 40.5.

3bd Architects leads the index with 70/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (43 vs 100); Content & trust (20 vs 75); Visibility (0 vs 31).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest keyframe in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Nicholas Morley Architects Ltd#6341/1002 places above you
Studio Green Architects#6739/1002 places below you
WH Architects#6242/1003 places above you
Architectural Interiors#6838/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 80 · accessibility 86 · best practices 81 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Improve image delivery; `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.; Links do not have a discernible name
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks39 referring domains · 40 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 24 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

keyframe’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.