LucyEdwards3D — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 47 / 100 · Rank 51 of 80

Digital Visibility Score47/100Rank 51 of 80 Furthest behind-17Speed & CWV: 46 against a sector median of 63

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	46	63	−17
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	67	78.5	−11.5
Visibility	0	0	level
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	45	37	+8

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-17
Technical		+12
Local presence		-11.5
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		+8

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	not in top 100
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	not in top 100
house extension architect Bath	not in top 100
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	not in top 100
residential architects Bath	not in top 100
commercial architects Bath	not in top 100
self build architect Bath	not in top 100
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		46
Technical		100
Local presence		67
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		45

this firm sector median leader

LucyEdwards3D trails Designscape Architects by 197 points across 5 pillars, but 57% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✗	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	45	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 104 words
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	67	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

Speed & CWV: 46/100, below the sector median of 63.
Local presence: 67/100, below the sector median of 78.5.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Speed & CWV (46 vs 99); Visibility (0 vs 53).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest LucyEdwards3D in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
John Mullen Building Surveying	#49	48/100	2 places above you
Burnford Architecture	#53	46/100	2 places below you
Chapter Interiors	#48	48/100	3 places above you
Carter Hughes Davies	#54	46/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 55 · accessibility 96 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Font display; Network dependency tree; Reduce unused CSS
Google profile detail	4 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks	42 referring domains · 50 links · rank 42
Site structure	1 pages crawled · 43 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 28 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	28 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 337 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

LucyEdwards3D’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.