Skip to content

Burnford Architecture — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 46 / 100 · Rank 53 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV4663−17
Technical10088+12
Local presence8078.5+1.5
Visibility40+4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust037−37
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-17
Technical+12
Local presence+1.5
Visibility+4
AI search presence0
Content & trust-37
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 6 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 62, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bath#62
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV46
Technical100
Local presence80
Visibility4
AI search presence0
Content & trust0

this firm sector median leader

Burnford Architecture trails Designscape Architects by 225 points across 5 pillars, but 50% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews3
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • planning permission2
  • team2
  • kitchen2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust0about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 6 words
Visibility4ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 62 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence803 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Speed & CWV: 46/100, below the sector median of 63.
  • Content & trust: 0/100, below the sector median of 37.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Speed & CWV (46 vs 99); Content & trust (0 vs 53).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
The firms nearest Burnford Architecture in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
LucyEdwards3D#5147/1002 places above you
Fairfield Banks#5546/1002 places below you
Curtis Cryer Architects#5047/1003 places above you
Moon DESIGN#5646/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 35 · accessibility 100 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: LCP breakdown; First Contentful Paint; Legacy JavaScript
Google profile detail27 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks48 referring domains · 52 links · rank 35
Site structure1 pages crawled · 3 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 39 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap39 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 539 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Burnford Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.