Fairfield Banks — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 46 / 100 · Rank 55 of 80

Digital Visibility Score46/100Rank 55 of 80Problems found1Structured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupFurthest behind-15.5Local presence: 63 against a sector median of 78.5

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	61	63	−2
Technical	88	88	level
Local presence	63	78.5	−15.5
Visibility	0	0	level
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	35	37	−2

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-2
Technical		0
Local presence		-15.5
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		-2

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

• Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	not in top 100
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	not in top 100
house extension architect Bath	not in top 100
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	not in top 100
residential architects Bath	not in top 100
commercial architects Bath	not in top 100
self build architect Bath	not in top 100
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		61
Technical		88
Local presence		63
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		35

this firm sector median leader

Fairfield Banks trails Designscape Architects by 208 points across 6 pillars, but 54% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✗	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	35	about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 445 words
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	63	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	88	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

• Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 78.5.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Speed & CWV (61 vs 99).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Fairfield Banks in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Burnford Architecture	#53	46/100	2 places above you
The Rez Group	#57	46/100	2 places below you
AHC Consultants	#52	46/100	3 places above you
Hambury Hird Design Ltd	#58	45/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	Company 07018393 · 17 years old · active · SIC 42990
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 58 · accessibility 84 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Forced reflow; `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail	3 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks	60 referring domains · 226 links · rank 76
Site structure	Not crawled — homepage HTTP 403

Where to get this fixed

Fairfield Banks’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

• Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
• AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

↑ Ranked aboveCarter Hughes Davies#54 · 46/100 Full indexAll 80 firms ↓ Ranked belowMoon DESIGN#56 · 46/100

---

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.