Skip to content

Carter Hughes Davies — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 46 / 100 · Rank 54 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5163−12
Technical7588−13
Local presence7878.5−0.5
Visibility130+13
AI search presence00level
Content & trust3737level
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-12
Technical-13
Local presence-0.5
Visibility+13
AI search presence0
Content & trust0
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 4.5 years ago.
Ranks for 3 of 12 keywords, average position 26.3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bath#46
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bath#6
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bath#27
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV51
Technical75
Local presence78
Visibility13
AI search presence0
Content & trust37

this firm sector median leader

Carter Hughes Davies trails Designscape Architects by 201 points across 6 pillars, but 54% of that is AI search presence and Speed & CWV alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews2
Locations2
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust37about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 829 words · last changed: 1652 days ago
Visibility13ranks for 3 of 12 keywords · average position 26.3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence782 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Speed & CWV: 51/100, below the sector median of 63.
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Speed & CWV (51 vs 99); Visibility (13 vs 53).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Carter Hughes Davies in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
AHC Consultants#5246/1002 places above you
Moon DESIGN#5646/1002 places below you
LucyEdwards3D#5147/1003 places above you
The Rez Group#5746/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 54 · accessibility 94 · best practices 96 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Serves images with low resolution; Minimize main-thread work
Google profile detailunclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks35 referring domains · 44 links · rank 54
Site structure1 pages crawled · 0 internal links per page
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates

Carter Hughes Davies’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.