Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 63 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Content & trust (17 vs 53).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 78 · accessibility 86 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; Buttons do not have an accessible name; Improve image delivery
Google profile detail
2 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
40 referring domains · 46 links · rank 216
Site structure
11 pages crawled · 5.1 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap
33 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Chapter Interiors’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.