Skip to content

Chapter Interiors — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 48 / 100 · Rank 48 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8963+26
Technical7588−13
Local presence6778.5−11.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust1737−20
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+26
Technical-13
Local presence-11.5
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-20
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 63 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV89
Technical75
Local presence67
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust17

this firm sector median leader

Chapter Interiors trails Designscape Architects by 207 points across 6 pillars, but 55% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bath
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust17about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 63 words · last changed: 0 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • Local presence: 67/100, below the sector median of 78.5.
  • Content & trust: 17/100, below the sector median of 37.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Content & trust (17 vs 53).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Chapter Interiors in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Alistair Ellen Architect#4648/1002 places above you
Curtis Cryer Architects#5047/1002 places below you
VASS Architects#4549/1003 places above you
LucyEdwards3D#5147/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 78 · accessibility 86 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; Buttons do not have an accessible name; Improve image delivery
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks40 referring domains · 46 links · rank 216
Site structure11 pages crawled · 5.1 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap33 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Chapter Interiors’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.