Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 32 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 9.5 years ago.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 60 · accessibility 89 · best practices 59 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Links do not have descriptive text; Forced reflow; Document does not have a main landmark.
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks
43 referring domains · 44 links · rank 53
Site structure
2 pages crawled · 28 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 9% of links use a generic anchor · 1 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
1 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 3941 days old · 1 of 1 sampled URLs resolve
Alistair Ellen Architect’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.