Digital Visibility Score: 39 / 100 · Rank 74 of 80
Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology . Spotted an error? Request a correction .
Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV -7 Technical -59 Local presence +2.5 Visibility 0 AI search presence +20 Content & trust -12
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Critical The site is not served over HTTPS Browsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right. Worth fixing No XML sitemap found Search engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not. Worth fixing No structured data on the homepage Nothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
Keyword Position architects Bath not in top 100 architect Bath not in top 100 architectural services Bath not in top 100 house extension architect Bath not in top 100 planning application architect Bath not in top 100 listed building architect Bath not in top 100 residential architects Bath not in top 100 commercial architects Bath not in top 100 self build architect Bath not in top 100 loft conversion architect Bath not in top 100 barn conversion architect Bath not in top 100 conservation architect Bath not in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV 56 Technical 29 Local presence 81 Visibility 0 AI search presence 20 Content & trust 25
this firm sector median leader
Llewellyn Harker Lowe Architects trails Designscape Architects by 244 points across 6 pillars, but 51% of that is Technical and Visibility alone.
Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
✗ Who are the best architects in Bath? ✗ Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension? ✗ Top rated architectural practices in Bath ✗ I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact? ✓ Conservation architects in Bath cited by domain
Google Business Profile.
Rating 5 / 5 Reviews 2 Locations 1 Reviews in last 90 days 0 Address matches website yes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset , so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Pillar Score Made up of Content & trust 25 about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 178 words Visibility 0 ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0 Local presence 81 2 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days Technical 29 HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: no
Technical: 29/100, below the sector median of 88.
Content & trust: 25/100, below the sector median of 37.
Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (29 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); Speed & CWV (56 vs 99).
Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Llewellyn Harker Lowe Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology .
Companies House No confident match on the registered name Real-user speed (CrUX) Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset Lighthouse (lab, mobile) Performance 55 · accessibility 87 · best practices 74 · SEO 82 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Network dependency tree; Reduce unused CSS Google profile detail 52 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed Backlinks 62 referring domains · 87 links · rank 116 · 29 broken Site structure 7 pages crawled · 66.4 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor Sitemap not declared in robots.txt
Llewellyn Harker Lowe Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
How this is measured: see the index methodology , and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC ; if you want this score moved, start here .