Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
2 critical problems found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe homepage carries a noindex instructionA meta robots or X-Robots-Tag directive is asking search engines to leave this page out of results.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 12 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company 10855978 · 9.2 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 65 · accessibility 92 · best practices 78 · SEO 66 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS; Largest Contentful Paint
Google profile detail
2 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Batterham Smith Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) and Content & trust (17/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.