Skip to content

Batterham Smith Architects — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 40 / 100 · Rank 72 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6363level
Technical3888−50
Local presence7678.5−2.5
Visibility00level
AI search presence200+20
Content & trust1737−20
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV0
Technical-50
Local presence-2.5
Visibility0
AI search presence+20
Content & trust-20
2 critical problems found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalThe homepage carries a noindex instructionA meta robots or X-Robots-Tag directive is asking search engines to leave this page out of results.
  • CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 12 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bathnot in top 100
architect Bathnot in top 100
architectural services Bathnot in top 100
house extension architect Bathnot in top 100
planning application architect Bathnot in top 100
listed building architect Bathnot in top 100
residential architects Bathnot in top 100
commercial architects Bathnot in top 100
self build architect Bathnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bathnot in top 100
conservation architect Bathnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV63
Technical38
Local presence76
Visibility0
AI search presence20
Content & trust17

this firm sector median leader

Batterham Smith Architects trails Designscape Architects by 241 points across 6 pillars, but 48% of that is Technical and Visibility alone.

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bath?
Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bathnamed
I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Bath
Google Business Profile.
Rating4 / 5
Reviews4
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust17about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 12 words · last changed: 0 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence764 reviews · rated 4 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical38HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: no · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: no · structured data: no
  • Technical: 38/100, below the sector median of 88.
  • Content & trust: 17/100, below the sector median of 37.

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (38 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); AI search presence (20 vs 60).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
  3. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
The firms nearest Batterham Smith Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Watson Bertram & Fell#7041/1002 places above you
Llewellyn Harker Lowe Architects#7439/1002 places below you
LaBox Design#6941/1003 places above you
Neil Pollard Architect Ltd#7537/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 10855978 · 9.2 years old · active · SIC 71111
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 65 · accessibility 92 · best practices 78 · SEO 66 — biggest losses: Render-blocking requests; Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS; Largest Contentful Paint
Google profile detail2 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks53 referring domains · 64 links · rank 96 · 2 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 1 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

Batterham Smith Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Visibility (0/100) and Content & trust (17/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.