Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 67 · accessibility 100 · best practices 81 · SEO 91 — biggest losses: Document request latency; Largest Contentful Paint; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail
24 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
119 referring domains · 191 links · rank 151
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 6 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
YOU&ME Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.