Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 78 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 53); Content & trust (20 vs 53).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
55 referring domains · 69 links · rank 3
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 7 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, team 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 37 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
38 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 21 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
RHaR - Rhodes Architects LLP’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.