Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Physiotherapy Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
83
Technical
33
Local presence
61
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Peter Jones Osteopath trails Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic by 250 points across 4 pillars, but 59% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic leads the index with 83/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Technical (33 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 64).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 84 · accessibility 94 · best practices 78 · SEO 40 — biggest losses: `<html>` element does not have a `[lang]` attribute; Document does not have a meta description; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail
6 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Peter Jones Osteopath’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.