Skip to content

Pitt Godden & Taylor LLP — Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 65 / 100 · Rank 5 of 41

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV7165.5+5.5
Technical3375−42
Local presence8179+2
Visibility6213+49
AI search presence800+80
Content & trust54not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+5.5
Technical-42
Local presence+2
Visibility+49
AI search presence+80
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 11 of 12 keywords, average position 5.7, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
accountants Gloucester#3
chartered accountants Gloucester#2
best accountants Gloucester#4
small business accountant Gloucester#4
tax advisor Gloucester#2
bookkeeping Gloucester#7
self assessment help Gloucester#7
company accounts Gloucester#3
payroll services Gloucester#16
accountants Quedgeley#7
accountants Hucclecote#8
bookkeeping Quedgeleynot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical33
Local presence81
Visibility62
AI search presence80

this firm sector median leader

The whole deficit to Griffiths Marshall is Technical55 points. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence, Visibility, AI search presence.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
payroll services Gloucester#16

1 position sits between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 4 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best accountants in Gloucester?named
Which accountant in Gloucester would you recommend for a small business?
Top rated chartered accountants in Gloucestercited by domain
I need an accountant in Gloucester - who should I contact?cited by domain
Best accountants in Quedgeley, Gloucestercited by domain
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews4
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility62ranks for 11 of 12 keywords · average position 5.7 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence814 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical33HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 33/100, below the sector median of 75.

Griffiths Marshall leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (33 vs 88).

  1. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Pitt Godden & Taylor LLP in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
APS Accounting#367/1002 places above you
Reed & Co Accountants#765/1002 places below you
iLex Accountancy Services Limited#268/1003 places above you
Hucclecote Accountancy & Taxation Services#864/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany OC372482 · 14.5 years old · active
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 80 · accessibility 64 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links rely on color to be distinguishable.; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Improve image delivery
Google profile detail9 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks74 referring domains · 231 links · rank 95 · 185 broken

Pitt Godden & Taylor LLP’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Technical (33/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
  • Visibility (62/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.