Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical
33
Local presence
81
Visibility
62
AI search presence
80
this firm sector median leader
The whole deficit to Griffiths Marshall is Technical — 55 points. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence, Visibility, AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
Company OC372482 · 14.5 years old · active
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 80 · accessibility 64 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links rely on color to be distinguishable.; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Improve image delivery
Google profile detail
9 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Pitt Godden & Taylor LLP’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Technical (33/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
Visibility (62/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.