Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
City Vets in Heavitree leads the index with 87/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 82); AI search presence (0 vs 60); Local presence (50 vs 99).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 69 · accessibility 75 · best practices 81 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Links do not have descriptive text; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.; Document does not have a main landmark.
Google profile detail
1 photo · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks
58 referring domains · 113 links · rank 118
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 36 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 3% of links use a generic anchor · 2 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
2 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 316 days old · 2 of 2 sampled URLs resolve
Tor Equine Vets’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.