Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
City Vets in Heavitree leads the index with 87/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 82); AI search presence (0 vs 60); Content & trust (55 vs 100).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 29 · accessibility 72 · best practices 78 · SEO 83 — biggest losses: Elements with `role="none"` or `role="presentation"` have conflicts; Minify JavaScript; Font display
Google profile detail
claimed · no description · no hours listed · 2 of 7 reviews are one star
1 pages crawled · 88 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 2% of links use a generic anchor · 100 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
101 URLs listed · not declared in robots.txt · newest entry 11 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
The Chicken Vet’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.