Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
84
Technical
33
Local presence
77
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
TFQ Architects trails Living Space Architects by 231 points across 4 pillars, but 72% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 82 · accessibility 94 · best practices 78 · SEO 40 — biggest losses: Page has unsuccessful HTTP status code; Render-blocking requests; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed · 1 of 5 reviews are one star
TFQ Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.