Skip to content

TFQ Architects — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 43 / 100 · Rank 55 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV8464+20
Technical3388−55
Local presence7776+1
Visibility04−4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust49.5not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+20
Technical-55
Local presence+1
Visibility-4
AI search presence0
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeternot in top 100
architect Exeternot in top 100
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeternot in top 100
commercial architects Exeternot in top 100
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV84
Technical33
Local presence77
Visibility0
AI search presence0

this firm sector median leader

TFQ Architects trails Living Space Architects by 231 points across 4 pillars, but 72% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating4 / 5
Reviews5
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence775 reviews · rated 4 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical33HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 33/100, below the sector median of 88.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Technical (33 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
The firms nearest TFQ Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Pea Green Studio Ltd - Commercial & Residential Interiors#5343/1002 places above you
Robinson Jary Architecture#5742/1002 places below you
Project Services Limited#5244/1003 places above you
Croft Surveyors#5841/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 82 · accessibility 94 · best practices 78 · SEO 40 — biggest losses: Page has unsuccessful HTTP status code; Render-blocking requests; Does not use HTTPS
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · no hours listed · 1 of 5 reviews are one star
Backlinks56 referring domains · 80 links · rank 105 · 84 broken
Site structureNot crawled — homepage HTTP 404

TFQ Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.