Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 10 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
100
Technical
14
Local presence
76
Visibility
0
AI search presence
40
Content & trust
0
this firm sector median leader
Project Services Limited trails Living Space Architects by 264 points across 5 pillars, but 55% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (14 vs 100); AI search presence (40 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 100 · accessibility 83 · best practices 78 · SEO 90 — biggest losses: Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS; Does not use HTTPS; Document does not have a meta description
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
40 referring domains · 49 links · rank 60
Site structure
9 pages crawled · 5 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Project Services Limited’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) and Content & trust (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing these pillars: visibility, content & trust.