Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 88 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 65 · accessibility 62 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Layout shift culprits; Reduce unused JavaScript; Document does not have a main landmark.
Google profile detail
21 photos · claimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
52 referring domains · 270 links · rank 87
Site structure
9 pages crawled · 12.3 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 5% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap
15 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 2629 days old · 2 of 2 sampled URLs resolve
Visibility (8/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.