Skip to content

Gale & Snowden Architects Ltd. — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 47 / 100 · Rank 45 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6464level
Technical8888level
Local presence6876−8
Visibility04−4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust3349.5−16.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV0
Technical0
Local presence-8
Visibility-4
AI search presence0
Content & trust-16.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6.9 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeternot in top 100
architect Exeternot in top 100
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeternot in top 100
residential architects Exeternot in top 100
commercial architects Exeternot in top 100
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeternot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV64
Technical88
Local presence68
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust33

this firm sector median leader

Gale & Snowden Architects Ltd. trails Living Space Architects by 220 points across 6 pillars, but 70% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
Google Business Profile.
Rating3 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust33about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 633 words · last changed: 2525 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence682 reviews · rated 3 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Content & trust: 33/100, below the sector median of 49.5.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 53); Local presence (68 vs 88).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Gale & Snowden Architects Ltd. in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Citizen Architects#4347/1002 places above you
Montage#4746/1002 places below you
Avalon Planning & Heritage#4247/1003 places above you
The Cave Co-operative#4845/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 61 · accessibility 88 · best practices 81 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Render-blocking requests
Google profile detail8 photos · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks150 referring domains · 665 links · rank 163 · 52 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 22 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 124 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap124 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 74 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Gale & Snowden Architects Ltd.’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.