Skip to content

Avalon Planning & Heritage — Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 47 / 100 · Rank 42 of 63

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Exeter Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5264−12
Technical7588−13
Local presence6776−9
Visibility84+4
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7049.5+20.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-12
Technical-13
Local presence-9
Visibility+4
AI search presence0
Content & trust+20.5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 2 of 12 keywords, average position 53.5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Exeternot in top 100
architect Exeternot in top 100
architectural services Exeternot in top 100
house extension architect Exeternot in top 100
planning application architect Exeternot in top 100
listed building architect Exeter#60
residential architects Exeternot in top 100
commercial architects Exeternot in top 100
self build architect Exeternot in top 100
loft conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
barn conversion architect Exeternot in top 100
conservation architect Exeter#47
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Living Space Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV52
Technical75
Local presence67
Visibility8
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Avalon Planning & Heritage trails Living Space Architects by 218 points across 5 pillars, but 67% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Exeter?
Which architect in Exeter would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Exeter
I need an architect in Exeter - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Exeter
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 267 words
Visibility8ranks for 2 of 12 keywords · average position 53.5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Speed & CWV: 52/100, below the sector median of 64.
  • Technical: 75/100, below the sector median of 88.

Living Space Architects leads the index with 82/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 100); Visibility (8 vs 53); Speed & CWV (52 vs 79).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Avalon Planning & Heritage in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Bennellick Architectural Design#4049/1002 places above you
Exeter Historic Building Trust#4447/1002 places below you
Expedite Design Services Ltd#3950/1003 places above you
Gale & Snowden Architects Ltd.#4547/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 63 · accessibility 93 · best practices 59 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Render-blocking requests; Reduce unused CSS
Google profile detail2 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks101 referring domains · 153 links · rank 139
Site structure1 pages crawled · 45 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 65 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap66 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Avalon Planning & Heritage’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.