Skip to content

Dragon Vets, Prestbury Park — Cheltenham Vet Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 62 / 100 · Rank 8 of 20

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6168−7
Technical088−88
Local presence9878.5+19.5
Visibility614.5+56.5
AI search presence1000+100
Content & trust53not measured
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-7
Technical-88
Local presence+19.5
Visibility+56.5
AI search presence+100
Content & trustnot measured
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Ranks for 10 of 12 keywords, average position 6.1, in the local 3-pack for 3 keywords.
KeywordPosition
vets Cheltenham#7
veterinary practice Cheltenham#6
best vets Cheltenham#9
emergency vet Cheltenham#1
cat vet Cheltenham#11
dog vet Cheltenham#6
24 hour vet Cheltenham#2
vet costs Cheltenham#2
animal hospital Cheltenham#15
vets Montpelliernot in top 100
vets Charlton Kings#2
veterinary Montpelliernot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Arvonia Vets Churchdown Veterinary Centre, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV61
Technical0
Local presence98
Visibility61
AI search presence100

this firm sector median leader

The whole deficit to Arvonia Vets Churchdown Veterinary Centre is Technical and Speed & CWV72 points. It already matches or beats the leader on Local presence, Visibility, AI search presence.

Ranked between #11 and #20 — one page from the first, ordered by how close.
cat vet Cheltenham#11
animal hospital Cheltenham#15

2 positions sit between #11 and #20 — one page away, and the cheapest ranking work available to this firm.

Named in 5 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best vets in Cheltenham?cited by domain
Which veterinary practice in Cheltenham would you recommend?cited by domain
Top rated vets in Cheltenhamcited by domain
My pet is unwell in Cheltenham - which vet should I call?cited by domain
Best vets in Montpellier, Cheltenhamcited by domain
Google Business Profile.
Rating4.58 / 5
Reviews529
Locations3
Reviews in last 90 days18
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Visibility61ranks for 10 of 12 keywords · average position 6.1 · local 3-pack: 3
Local presence98529 reviews · rated 4.58 · 18 new in 90 days
Technical0HTTPS: — · page allows indexing: — · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: —
  • Technical: 0/100, below the sector median of 88.

Arvonia Vets Churchdown Veterinary Centre leads the index with 76/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (0 vs 63).

  1. Add valid LocalBusiness schema, fix indexability, and ensure a fresh XML sitemap is referenced in robots.txt.
  2. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
  3. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
The firms nearest Dragon Vets, Prestbury Park in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Woodmancote Vets#671/1002 places above you
Wood Veterinary Group, Longlevens#1058/1002 places below you
Regency Vets#574/1003 places above you
Cheltenham Equine Vets#1157/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 62 · accessibility 93 · best practices 73 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Legacy JavaScript; Uses deprecated APIs; Use efficient cache lifetimes
Google profile detail10 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed · 6 of 22 reviews are one star
Backlinks156 referring domains · 672 links · rank 177
Site structureNot crawled — fetch failed

Dragon Vets, Prestbury Park’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

  • Technical (0/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.
  • Visibility (61/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.