Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.4 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
27
Technical
88
Local presence
67
Visibility
17
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
53
this firm sector median leader
Regency Contracting Cheltenham Ltd trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 142 points across 5 pillars, but 61% of that is Speed & CWV and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Speed & CWV (27 vs 75); Content & trust (53 vs 91); Local presence (67 vs 97).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 45 · accessibility 77 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Links do not have a discernible name; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Google profile detail
30 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Visibility (17/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.