Skip to content

Regency Contracting Cheltenham Ltd — Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 44 / 100 · Rank 31 of 52

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV2763−36
Technical8875+13
Local presence6776−9
Visibility170+17
AI search presence00level
Content & trust5340+13
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-36
Technical+13
Local presence-9
Visibility+17
AI search presence0
Content & trust+13
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.4 years ago.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 29.3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Cheltenham#50
construction companies Cheltenham#22
best builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extensions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversions Cheltenham#37
new build developers Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial construction Cheltenham#8
groundworks contractors Cheltenhamnot in top 100
renovation builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
builders Montpelliernot in top 100
builders Charlton Kingsnot in top 100
construction Montpelliernot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV27
Technical88
Local presence67
Visibility17
AI search presence0
Content & trust53

this firm sector median leader

Regency Contracting Cheltenham Ltd trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 142 points across 5 pillars, but 61% of that is Speed & CWV and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Cheltenham?
Which construction company in Cheltenham would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Cheltenham
I need a builder in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in Montpellier, Cheltenham
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust53about page: no · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 938 words · last changed: 1958 days ago
Visibility17ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 29.3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Speed & CWV: 27/100, below the sector median of 63.

The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Speed & CWV (27 vs 75); Content & trust (53 vs 91); Local presence (67 vs 97).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Regency Contracting Cheltenham Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
BKS Bathroom and Kitchen Specialists#2944/1002 places above you
KW Construction Group#3342/1002 places below you
Charlton Piling & Foundations Ltd#2845/1003 places above you
Tom Hazzledine#3442/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 45 · accessibility 77 · best practices 78 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Links do not have a discernible name; Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Google profile detail30 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks101 referring domains · 205 links · rank 119 · 73 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 43 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor

Regency Contracting Cheltenham Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.