Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 244 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
65
Technical
63
Local presence
76
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
10
this firm sector median leader
A P P trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 180 points across 5 pillars, but 66% of that is Content & trust and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (10 vs 91); Technical (63 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 31).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 69 · accessibility 77 · best practices 78 · SEO 83 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Links do not have a discernible name; Document does not have a meta description
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks
20 referring domains · 377 links · rank 84
Site structure
7 pages crawled · 19.7 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 1 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
A P P’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.