Skip to content

EMG Construction — Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 41 / 100 · Rank 35 of 52

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6563+2
Technical7575level
Local presence5976−17
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust1540−25
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+2
Technical0
Local presence-17
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-25
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
construction companies Cheltenhamnot in top 100
best builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extensions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
new build developers Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial construction Cheltenhamnot in top 100
groundworks contractors Cheltenhamnot in top 100
renovation builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
builders Montpelliernot in top 100
builders Charlton Kingsnot in top 100
construction Montpelliernot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV65
Technical75
Local presence59
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust15

this firm sector median leader

EMG Construction trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 180 points across 5 pillars, but 63% of that is Content & trust and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Cheltenham?
Which construction company in Cheltenham would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Cheltenham
I need a builder in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in Montpellier, Cheltenham
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust15about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 484 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 76.
  • Content & trust: 15/100, below the sector median of 40.

The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (15 vs 91); Local presence (59 vs 97); Visibility (0 vs 31).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest EMG Construction in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
KW Construction Group#3342/1002 places above you
TPM builders#3740/1002 places below you
A P P#3242/1003 places above you
Iceberg Developments Cheltenham#3839/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 79 · accessibility 95 · best practices 78 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Document request latency
Google profile detailunclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks67 referring domains · 526 links · rank 148 · 22 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 14 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 43% of links use a generic anchor

EMG Construction’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.