Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
2 critical problems found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 7.9 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
61
Technical
50
Local presence
63
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
37
this firm sector median leader
Iceberg Developments Cheltenham trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 183 points across 5 pillars, but 57% of that is Content & trust and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (37 vs 91); Technical (50 vs 100); Local presence (63 vs 97).
Iceberg Developments Cheltenham’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.