Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 116 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6.4 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
100
Technical
14
Local presence
55
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
24
this firm sector median leader
Planet Building Design Ltd trails RE-Design Architects by 277 points across 5 pillars, but 60% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Planet Building Design Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.