Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 381 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
57
Technical
50
Local presence
76
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
30
this firm sector median leader
Peter A Marshall Architect Limited trails RE-Design Architects by 215 points across 6 pillars, but 60% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone.
Peter A Marshall Architect Limited’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.