Skip to content

Conault Design — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 35 / 100 · Rank 54 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV9963+36
Technical1475−61
Local presence5973−14
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust335−32
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+36
Technical-61
Local presence-14
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-32
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalThe site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers mark it as not secure, and it is a ranking signal in its own right.
  • Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
  • Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
  • Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 9 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 11.7 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architectural services Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extension architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
planning application architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
listed building architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
residential architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
self build architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV99
Technical14
Local presence59
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust3

this firm sector median leader

Conault Design trails RE-Design Architects by 294 points across 5 pillars, but 56% of that is Technical and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust3about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 9 words · last changed: 4254 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence590 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical14HTTPS: no · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: — · sitemap: no · structured data: no
  • Technical: 14/100, below the sector median of 75.
  • Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 73.
  • Content & trust: 3/100, below the sector median of 35.

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: Technical (14 vs 100); AI search presence (0 vs 80); Content & trust (3 vs 53).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Conault Design in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Tecbüro AT Ltd#5240/1002 places above you
Greet Building Services Ltd#5622/1002 places below you
Peter A Marshall Architect Limited#5140/1003 places above you
House Doctor#5718/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 98 · accessibility 85 · best practices 70 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Document does not have a main landmark.; Tables do not use `<caption>` instead of cells with the `[colspan]` attribute to indicate a caption.; `<html>` element does not have a `[lang]` attribute
Google profile detail6 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Backlinks53 referring domains · 134 links · rank 72
Site structure9 pages crawled · 7.2 internal links per page · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapnot declared in robots.txt

Conault Design’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.