Skip to content

Easton Bevins — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 52 / 100 · Rank 23 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6963+6
Technical8875+13
Local presence7373level
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust6335+28
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+6
Technical+13
Local presence0
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+28
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architectural services Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extension architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
planning application architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
listed building architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
residential architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
self build architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV69
Technical88
Local presence73
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust63

this firm sector median leader

Easton Bevins trails RE-Design Architects by 156 points across 4 pillars, but 83% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating4 / 5
Reviews2
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust63about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,048 words · last changed: 312 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence732 reviews · rated 4 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Visibility (0 vs 49); Local presence (73 vs 88).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Easton Bevins in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Elite Builders Cheltenham#2153/1002 places above you
Journeyman Draughting & Design#2552/1002 places below you
Cheltenham CAD Services Ltd T/A Hoch Bau Architecture + Engineering#2053/1003 places above you
VJM Design House Ltd#2652/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 54 · accessibility 81 · best practices 78 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Minify JavaScript; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Document request latency
Google profile detail3 photos · claimed · has a description · no hours listed
Backlinks131 referring domains · 1756 links · rank 174 · 1 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 108 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 17% of links use a generic anchor · 358 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap359 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 19 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Easton Bevins’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.