Sicolo Webb Architects — Bath Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 57 / 100 · Rank 19 of 80

Digital Visibility Score57/100Rank 19 of 80 · top 23%Problems found1Very little published content Furthest behind-2Speed & CWV: 61 against a sector median of 63

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bath Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	61	63	−2
Technical	100	88	+12
Local presence	84	78.5	+5.5
Visibility	0	0	level
AI search presence	20	0	+20
Content & trust	45	37	+8

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-2
Technical		+12
Local presence		+5.5
Visibility		0
AI search presence		+20
Content & trust		+8

Problems found

These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.

Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 146 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
architects Bath	not in top 100
architect Bath	not in top 100
architectural services Bath	not in top 100
house extension architect Bath	not in top 100
planning application architect Bath	not in top 100
listed building architect Bath	not in top 100
residential architects Bath	not in top 100
commercial architects Bath	not in top 100
self build architect Bath	not in top 100
loft conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
barn conversion architect Bath	not in top 100
conservation architect Bath	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Designscape Architects, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		61
Technical		100
Local presence		84
Visibility		0
AI search presence		20
Content & trust		45

this firm sector median leader

Sicolo Webb Architects trails Designscape Architects by 145 points across 5 pillars, but 64% of that is Visibility and AI search presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

AI search presence

Named in 1 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best architects in Bath?
✓	Which architect in Bath would you recommend for a house extension?	named
✗	Top rated architectural practices in Bath
✗	I need an architect in Bath - who should I contact?
✗	Conservation architects in Bath

Local presence

Google Business Profile.

Rating	5 / 5
Reviews	4
Locations	1
Reviews in last 90 days	0
Address matches website	yes

What customers talk about

Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.

communication2
space2
floor2
ideas2
bath2
budget2

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	45	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: no · homepage: 146 words
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	84	4 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

How this compares to the leader

Designscape Architects leads the index with 80/100. The largest gaps are: Visibility (0 vs 53); AI search presence (20 vs 60); Speed & CWV (61 vs 99).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Sicolo Webb Architects in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Etons Of Bath	#17	57/100	2 places above you
Studio Four Point Ten Architects	#21	57/100	2 places below you
Nick Shipp Architects	#16	58/100	3 places above you
Bath Heritage Building ltd	#22	56/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 61 · accessibility 94 · best practices 100 · SEO 92 — biggest losses: Links do not have a discernible name; Legacy JavaScript; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Google profile detail	11 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks	48 referring domains · 150 links · rank 0
Site structure	25 pages crawled · 27.4 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap	23 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 36 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Where to get this fixed

Sicolo Webb Architects’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
AI search presence (20/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.