Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Worcester Physiotherapy Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo XML sitemap foundSearch engines have to discover every page by following links. On a small site that is survivable; on a large one it is not.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
86
Technical
33
Local presence
47
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
this firm sector median leader
Sandie Davis Physiotherapy trails Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic by 264 points across 4 pillars, but 56% of that is AI search presence and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Speed & CWV.
Worcester Physiotherapy Clinic leads the index with 83/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Technical (33 vs 100); Visibility (0 vs 64).
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 88 · accessibility 94 · best practices 96 · SEO 40 — biggest losses: Network dependency tree; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Document does not have a meta description
Google profile detail
1 photo · claimed · no description · no hours listed
Sandie Davis Physiotherapy’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.