Skip to content

Burton Sweet Ltd — Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 49 / 100 · Rank 27 of 41

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5865.5−7.5
Technical8875+13
Local presence6379−16
Visibility013−13
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7054+16
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-7.5
Technical+13
Local presence-16
Visibility-13
AI search presence0
Content & trust+16
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
accountants Gloucesternot in top 100
chartered accountants Gloucesternot in top 100
best accountants Gloucesternot in top 100
small business accountant Gloucesternot in top 100
tax advisor Gloucesternot in top 100
bookkeeping Gloucesternot in top 100
self assessment help Gloucesternot in top 100
company accounts Gloucesternot in top 100
payroll services Gloucesternot in top 100
accountants Quedgeleynot in top 100
accountants Hucclecotenot in top 100
bookkeeping Quedgeleynot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical88
Local presence63
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Burton Sweet Ltd trails Griffiths Marshall by 148 points across 4 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best accountants in Gloucester?
Which accountant in Gloucester would you recommend for a small business?
Top rated chartered accountants in Gloucester
I need an accountant in Gloucester - who should I contact?
Best accountants in Quedgeley, Gloucester
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: yes · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,342 words · last changed: 2189 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence630 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 79.
  • Visibility: 0/100, below the sector median of 13.

Griffiths Marshall leads the index with 73/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 60); Visibility (0 vs 50); Content & trust (70 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Burton Sweet Ltd in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
PCD Accountancy Limited#2551/1002 places above you
The Accountancy & Finance House Ltd#2948/1002 places below you
Padam Walburn Accounting Services#2451/1003 places above you
AGR Accounts Ltd#3047/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 56 · accessibility 79 · best practices 100 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Use efficient cache lifetimes; Improve image delivery; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks169 referring domains · 642 links · rank 191 · 11 broken
Site structure1 pages crawled · 78 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 9% of links use a generic anchor

Burton Sweet Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.