Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Gloucester Accountant Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingStructured data present, but no LocalBusiness markupThe page describes something to machines, but not that it is a local business with an address and opening hours.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 6 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, Griffiths Marshall, on every pillar.
Technical
88
Local presence
63
Visibility
0
AI search presence
0
Content & trust
70
this firm sector median leader
Burton Sweet Ltd trails Griffiths Marshall by 148 points across 4 pillars, but 74% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 56 · accessibility 79 · best practices 100 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Use efficient cache lifetimes; Improve image delivery; Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.
Google profile detail
1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Burton Sweet Ltd’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.