Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Vet Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
Performance 58 · accessibility 88 · best practices 100 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.; Use efficient cache lifetimes; Network dependency tree
Google profile detail
26 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 4 of 182 reviews are one star
Backlinks
93 referring domains · 385 links · rank 197
Site structure
25 pages crawled · 52 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, team 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemap
25 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 25 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Arvonia Vets Churchdown Veterinary Centre’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Visibility (58/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
Technical (63/100) — read SEO automation on running these technical checks continuously rather than once a quarter. Background on analysing this pillar: technical.