Skip to content

APEX Groundworks — Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 48 / 100 · Rank 20 of 52

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV6763+4
Technical7575level
Local presence6776−9
Visibility220+22
AI search presence00level
Content & trust2940−11
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV+4
Technical0
Local presence-9
Visibility+22
AI search presence0
Content & trust-11
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 1 of 12 keywords, average position 5, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
construction companies Cheltenhamnot in top 100
best builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extensions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversions Cheltenhamnot in top 100
new build developers Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial construction Cheltenhamnot in top 100
groundworks contractors Cheltenham#5
renovation builders Cheltenhamnot in top 100
builders Montpelliernot in top 100
builders Charlton Kingsnot in top 100
construction Montpelliernot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV67
Technical75
Local presence67
Visibility22
AI search presence0
Content & trust29

this firm sector median leader

APEX Groundworks trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 134 points across 5 pillars, but 69% of that is Content & trust and Local presence alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best builders in Cheltenham?
Which construction company in Cheltenham would you recommend for an extension?
Top rated building contractors in Cheltenham
I need a builder in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Best construction firms in Montpellier, Cheltenham
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust29about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: no · homepage: 449 words · last changed: 23 days ago
Visibility22ranks for 1 of 12 keywords · average position 5 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence670 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • Content & trust: 29/100, below the sector median of 40.

The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Content & trust (29 vs 91); Local presence (67 vs 97); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Add about/team pages and the credentials that matter in this sector (FMB, TrustMark, NHBC), and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest APEX Groundworks in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
LPD Building Services Limited#1849/1002 places above you
Corinium Construction Ltd#2248/1002 places below you
Easy Construction#1749/1003 places above you
Hemming Architectural and Surveying Services Ltd#2348/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 74 · accessibility 93 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Does not use HTTPS; `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements do not have a title; Reduce unused JavaScript
Google profile detail9 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks42 referring domains · 42 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 35 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, services 1 click · 9% of links use a generic anchor · 11 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap12 URLs listed

APEX Groundworks’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.