Easy Construction — Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 49 / 100 · Rank 17 of 52

Digital Visibility Score49/100Rank 17 of 52 · top 31%Furthest behind-17Local presence: 59 against a sector median of 76

Measured 29 August 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Construction Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Pillar breakdown vs sector median

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.

Pillar	Score	Median	vs median
Speed & CWV	56	63	−7
Technical	100	75	+25
Local presence	59	76	−17
Visibility	0	0	level
AI search presence	0	0	level
Content & trust	58	40	+18

Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.

Speed & CWV		-7
Technical		+25
Local presence		-17
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		+18

Where this firm ranks

Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.

Keyword	Position
builders Cheltenham	not in top 100
construction companies Cheltenham	not in top 100
best builders Cheltenham	not in top 100
house extensions Cheltenham	not in top 100
loft conversions Cheltenham	not in top 100
new build developers Cheltenham	not in top 100
commercial construction Cheltenham	not in top 100
groundworks contractors Cheltenham	not in top 100
renovation builders Cheltenham	not in top 100
builders Montpellier	not in top 100
builders Charlton Kings	not in top 100
construction Montpellier	not in top 100

The gap to the leader

This firm against the sector median and the index leader, The Little Conservatory Company LTD, on every pillar.

Speed & CWV		56
Technical		100
Local presence		59
Visibility		0
AI search presence		0
Content & trust		58

this firm sector median leader

Easy Construction trails The Little Conservatory Company LTD by 121 points across 4 pillars, but 59% of that is Local presence and Content & trust alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, AI search presence.

AI search presence

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.

✗	Who are the best builders in Cheltenham?
✗	Which construction company in Cheltenham would you recommend for an extension?
✗	Top rated building contractors in Cheltenham
✗	I need a builder in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
✗	Best construction firms in Montpellier, Cheltenham

Why this score

What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Pillar	Score	Made up of
Content & trust	58	about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 295 words · last changed: 1 days ago
Visibility	0	ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence	59	0 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical	100	HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes

Key findings

Local presence: 59/100, below the sector median of 76.

How this compares to the leader

The Little Conservatory Company LTD leads the index with 68/100. The largest gaps are: Local presence (59 vs 97); Content & trust (58 vs 91); Visibility (0 vs 31).

Top fixes (ranked by impact)

Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.

Firms ranked near this one

The firms nearest Easy Construction in this ranking, beyond the two either side.

Firm	Rank	Score	Why it is here
Cranatt Construction Ltd	#15	50/100	2 places above you
R and S Building Services Engineers	#19	49/100	2 places below you
VIP Properties Ltd	#14	51/100	3 places above you
APEX Groundworks	#20	48/100	3 places below you

Context (not scored)

Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.

Companies House	No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)	Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)	Performance 57 · accessibility 88 · best practices 96 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order; Reduce unused JavaScript; `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.
Google profile detail	claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks	20813 referring domains · 497034 links · rank 531 · 2391 broken
Site structure	11 pages crawled · 8.1 internal links per page · reachable in: about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 2 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap	12 URLs listed

Where to get this fixed

Easy Construction’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:

Visibility (0/100) — read topical authority on why ranking breadth across a sector beats chasing single terms. Background on analysing this pillar: visibility.
AI search presence (0/100) — read generative engine optimisation on getting named by the answer engines this pillar measures. Background on analysing this pillar: ai search presence.

How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.