Skip to content

Partnership Design | Architectural Designer — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 46 / 100 · Rank 40 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5663−7
Technical7575level
Local presence8373+10
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust3035−5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-7
Technical0
Local presence+10
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust-5
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth fixingNo structured data on the homepageNothing tells a search engine or an assistant what this business is, where it is, or what it does — in machine-readable terms.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architectural services Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extension architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
planning application architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
listed building architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
residential architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
self build architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV56
Technical75
Local presence83
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust30

this firm sector median leader

Partnership Design | Architectural Designer trails RE-Design Architects by 184 points across 6 pillars, but 70% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews11
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
Themes Google extracted from this business’s reviews, by how often customers raise them. Not scored — this is what people say, not how findable the business is.
  • drawings6
  • cottage5
  • projects4
  • practicality3
  • solution3
  • kitchen3
  • detailed drawings2
  • planning consents2
  • imaginative solutions2
  • design ideas2
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust30about page: no · team page: no · credentials: no · blog or news: yes · homepage: 281 words
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence8311 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical75HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: no
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Visibility (0 vs 49); Technical (75 vs 100).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Add about/team pages, and refresh stale content.
The firms nearest Partnership Design | Architectural Designer in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
ChappellSmith Limited#3846/1002 places above you
shen carter studio#4245/1002 places below you
Trower Davies Architectural Consultants#3748/1003 places above you
Smith Hotchen Partnership#4345/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 66 · accessibility 92 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Avoid multiple page redirects; Document request latency; Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Google profile detail3 photos · claimed · no description · no hours listed · 0 of 11 reviews are one star
Backlinks33 referring domains · 42 links · rank 70
Site structure1 pages crawled · 19 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 5 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap7 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 1610 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve

Partnership Design | Architectural Designer’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.