Skip to content

Blueprint Architecture — Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 50 / 100 · Rank 30 of 59

Measured 1 September 2026 via the PYC Cheltenham Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5463−9
Technical10075+25
Local presence6373−10
Visibility00level
AI search presence00level
Content & trust7035+35
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-9
Technical+25
Local presence-10
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust+35
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.8 years ago.
Ranks for 0 of 12 keywords, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
architectural services Cheltenhamnot in top 100
house extension architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
planning application architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
listed building architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
residential architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
commercial architects Cheltenhamnot in top 100
self build architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
conservation architect Cheltenhamnot in top 100
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, RE-Design Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV54
Technical100
Local presence63
Visibility0
AI search presence0
Content & trust70

this firm sector median leader

Blueprint Architecture trails RE-Design Architects by 158 points across 4 pillars, but 82% of that is AI search presence and Visibility alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Technical, Content & trust.

Named in 0 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Cheltenham?
Which architect in Cheltenham would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Cheltenham
I need an architect in Cheltenham - who should I contact?
Conservation architects in Cheltenham
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust70about page: yes · team page: no · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,617 words · last changed: 2109 days ago
Visibility0ranks for 0 of 12 keywords · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence630 reviews · 0 new in 90 days
Technical100HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: yes · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • Local presence: 63/100, below the sector median of 73.

RE-Design Architects leads the index with 74/100. The largest gaps are: AI search presence (0 vs 80); Visibility (0 vs 49); Local presence (63 vs 88).

  1. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  2. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest Blueprint Architecture in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
Cotswold Architecture + Design | Contemporary Architecture & Extension Specialists#2851/1002 places above you
Architecture Consultant in Cheltenham Gloucestershire#3249/1002 places below you
Void Projects#2752/1003 places above you
Hodsons Limited#3349/1003 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseCompany 04225559 · 25.3 years old · active · SIC 71129
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 54 · accessibility 87 · best practices 78 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript; Document request latency; Reduce JavaScript execution time
Google profile detail1 photo · unclaimed · no description · hours listed
Backlinks39 referring domains · 46 links · rank 99
Site structure1 pages crawled · 48 internal links per page · reachable in: contact 1 click, about 1 click, services 1 click · 2% of links use a generic anchor
Sitemapdeclared in robots.txt · no lastmod dates

Blueprint Architecture’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.