Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
Worth fixingNo mobile viewport tagThe page is not telling phones how to lay itself out. Most local searches happen on one.
Worth fixingVery little published contentThe homepage carries 316 words and the site links to no blog, news or insights section. There is little here for a search engine to match, or for an assistant to quote.
Worth knowingThe site has not changed in a long timeThe homepage last reported a change 5.4 years ago.
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV
61
Technical
88
Local presence
88
Visibility
30
AI search presence
40
Content & trust
28
this firm sector median leader
Moon Design trails 3bd Architects by 100 points across 5 pillars, but 86% of that is Content & trust and Speed & CWV alone. It already matches or beats the leader on AI search presence.
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies House
No confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)
Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)
Performance 48 · accessibility 49 · best practices 81 · SEO 85 — biggest losses: Reduce unused JavaScript; Links are not crawlable; Uses deprecated APIs
Google profile detail
14 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed · 0 of 10 reviews are one star
Backlinks
247 referring domains · 489 links · rank 122
Site structure
1 pages crawled · 39 internal links per page · reachable in: about 1 click, services 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 17 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap
18 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 61 days old · 5 of 5 sampled URLs resolve
Moon Design’s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:
Content & trust (28/100) and Visibility (30/100) — read topical authority on how depth and coverage compound into citation-worthiness. Background on analysing these pillars: content & trust, visibility.