Skip to content

CGA Architects (Chris Goodsall) — Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Score

Digital Visibility Score: 65 / 100 · Rank 3 of 80

Measured 31 August 2026 via the PYC Bristol Architect Digital Visibility Index. Every figure is objective and reproducible from the methodology. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Each pillar scored 0–100 against the sector median for this index. The final column is this firm's distance from that median.
PillarScoreMedianvs median
Speed & CWV5866−8
Technical8875+13
Local presence7976.5+2.5
Visibility410+41
AI search presence400+40
Content & trust8040.5+39.5
Pillar performance against the sector median. Bars right of centre are above the median, left are below.
Speed & CWV-8
Technical+13
Local presence+2.5
Visibility+41
AI search presence+40
Content & trust+39.5
1 critical problem found. These are specific, checkable faults on the site — not opinions about it.
  • CriticalSearch engines are being told not to index this siteThe site’s own robots.txt disallows crawling. Until that changes, nothing else on this page can help — the pages cannot enter the index in the first place.
Ranks for 4 of 12 keywords, average position 3, in the local 3-pack for 0 keywords.
KeywordPosition
architects Bristolnot in top 100
architect Bristolnot in top 100
architectural services Bristolnot in top 100
house extension architect Bristolnot in top 100
planning application architect Bristol#2
listed building architect Bristol#3
residential architects Bristolnot in top 100
commercial architects Bristol#6
self build architect Bristolnot in top 100
loft conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
barn conversion architect Bristolnot in top 100
conservation architect Bristol#1
This firm against the sector median and the index leader, 3bd Architects, on every pillar.
Speed & CWV58
Technical88
Local presence79
Visibility41
AI search presence40
Content & trust80

this firm sector median leader

CGA Architects (Chris Goodsall) trails 3bd Architects by 64 points across 3 pillars, but 84% of that is Speed & CWV and Technical alone. It already matches or beats the leader on Visibility, AI search presence, Content & trust.

Named in 2 of 5 AI answers. A domain citation is stronger evidence than a name mention.
Who are the best architects in Bristol?
Which architect in Bristol would you recommend for a house extension?
Top rated architectural practices in Bristol
I need an architect in Bristol - who should I contact?cited by domain
Conservation architects in Bristolcited by domain
Google Business Profile.
Rating5 / 5
Reviews1
Locations1
Reviews in last 90 days0
Address matches websiteyes
What each score is made of. Every input here is in the open dataset, so the arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.
PillarScoreMade up of
Content & trust80about page: no · team page: yes · credentials: yes · blog or news: yes · homepage: 1,106 words
Visibility41ranks for 4 of 12 keywords · average position 3 · local 3-pack: 0
Local presence791 reviews · rated 5 · 0 new in 90 days
Technical88HTTPS: yes · page allows indexing: yes · robots.txt allows crawling: no · sitemap: yes · structured data: yes
  • No pillar falls materially below the sector median this quarter.

3bd Architects leads the index with 70/100. The largest gaps are: Speed & CWV (58 vs 100); Technical (88 vs 100); Local presence (79 vs 89).

  1. Publish structured, citable content and entity schema so AI engines surface the business for core local queries.
  2. Build local landing pages for the core keyword basket to lift organic and local-pack appearance.
  3. Cut mobile LCP below 2.5s (optimise images and remove render-blocking resources) — the biggest score and ranking lever.
The firms nearest CGA Architects (Chris Goodsall) in this ranking, beyond the two either side.
FirmRankScoreWhy it is here
3bd Architects#170/1002 places above you
Smith Maloney Hillier Architects Ltd#564/1002 places below you
Moon Design#661/1003 places below you
AHR Architects | Bristol#759/1004 places below you
Recorded alongside the measurement to make it easier to judge, but carrying no weight in the Digital Visibility Score. See the methodology.
Companies HouseNo confident match on the registered name
Real-user speed (CrUX)Too little traffic to appear in Chrome’s public dataset
Lighthouse (lab, mobile)Performance 56 · accessibility 95 · best practices 81 · SEO 100 — biggest losses: Forced reflow; Largest Contentful Paint; Document request latency
Google profile detail24 photos · claimed · has a description · hours listed
Backlinks29 referring domains · 32 links · rank 0
Site structure1 pages crawled · 29 internal links per page · reachable in: team 1 click · 0% of links use a generic anchor · 4 sitemap pages not reachable by following links
Sitemap4 URLs listed · declared in robots.txt · newest entry 693 days old · 4 of 4 sampled URLs resolve

CGA Architects (Chris Goodsall)‘s lowest-scoring pillars among those we publish remediation guidance for:


How this is measured: see the index methodology, and the statistical methods behind each pillar. This index is published by PYC; if you want this score moved, start here.